Site servicing plans. Clear connections. Coordinated design.
A site servicing plan coordinates water, sanitary and storm connections with the proposed building and surrounding infrastructure. Elmid Design Inc. prepares site servicing drawings and supporting engineering analysis for residential, commercial, industrial and institutional projects in Toronto, the GTA and Ontario. The site servicing plan is coordinated with the grading plan to align utility connections with proposed grades and drainage.
Engineering design and review support • Toronto, GTA and Ontario
Elmid Design Inc.: site servicing engineering
Elmid Design Inc. is an Ontario professional engineering and design consulting firm based in Richmond Hill. We help property owners, developers and project teams coordinate site servicing plans with grading, stormwater management and building design.
Our work begins with the property, the proposed development and the reviewing authority’s requirements. We identify the drawings, supporting analysis and consultant inputs needed for the agreed assignment. For example, a new home connection requires a different level of coordination from a phased subdivision or a large commercial building.
Elmid Design Inc. provides engineering design, drawings, reports and review support. The project-specific proposal defines the deliverables, available background information and any construction-stage engineering services. Learn about Elmid Design Inc.
Low-Rise Residential Site Servicing Plans
Low-rise residential site servicing plans coordinate water, sanitary and storm connections for new homes, semi-detached dwellings, townhouses and infill projects. The design relates those services to the proposed building, lot boundaries and drainage arrangement.
Start with the property survey and proposed building plans. The engineering review then considers existing connections, proposed service routes, building discharge points and relevant elevations. A connection may need to be retained, relocated, replaced or assessed further.
For additions and extra dwelling units, the presence of an existing pipe does not establish that it suits the proposed use. Confirm the required servicing scope with the municipality before relying on an older drawing.
The servicing plan should also align with the site grading plan. In Brampton, for example, the Custom Home Review process includes grading, servicing and site drainage. Other municipalities use their own submission processes.
Medium- and Large-Building Servicing Plans
Medium- and large-building servicing plans coordinate the civil infrastructure for multi-unit residential, mixed-use, commercial, industrial and institutional developments. The scope reflects the building use, occupancy and site arrangement.
Water demand, wastewater flows and fire-protection information help inform the design. The servicing layout must also coordinate with large roofs, parking areas, loading spaces, landscaping and building-services connections. Civil, architectural and mechanical drawings need compatible assumptions and connection locations.
Where required, a Functional Servicing Report explains the servicing approach and supporting analysis. The detailed plan then identifies the proposed pipes, structures and connections. Stormwater reporting and grading drawings complete the relevant drainage information.
For additions or changes of use, Elmid Design Inc. reviews what can be retained and what needs further assessment. In Toronto, the Site Servicing Plan terms of reference identify the drawing information required for Site Plan Control applications. Confirm the current scope for the property and application.
Subdivision Servicing Plans
Subdivision servicing plans address the coordinated water, sanitary and storm systems for multiple lots, blocks and roads. The design needs to consider the wider network, connection points, road layout, drainage outlets and the proposed development phases.
The engineering package may include servicing drawings, plan and profile drawings, grading plans, drainage-area plans and supporting reports. Its contents depend on the municipality, available infrastructure and project conditions. A Functional Servicing Report can establish the overall approach before detailed drawings develop it further.
Phasing deserves attention early. Identify which infrastructure will serve each stage, what must be available first and whether interim arrangements need separate review. A final build-out layout does not establish how an earlier phase will operate.
Elmid Design Inc.’s published project portfolio lists subdivision design at Clinton Drive Extension in Richmond Hill, including servicing plans and plan and profile drawings. This identifies the design scope, without implying a construction or approval outcome.
Richmond Hill’s subdivision application guidance describes engineering submissions following draft approval. Confirm the applicable submission stage and municipal criteria before defining the detailed servicing assignment.
What is a site servicing plan?
A site servicing plan is an engineering drawing that sets out the proposed water, sanitary and storm services for a property. It shows how connections, pipes and structures fit together, and how the design relates to the surrounding infrastructure. The drawing turns a servicing concept into a coordinated layout that a municipality and project team can review.
Elmid Design Inc. prepares site servicing plans for residential and non-residential projects. The work may include new connections, altered routes or upgrades to existing private services. The scope depends on the development, available records and reviewing authority.
A good drawing also makes its limits clear. Existing infrastructure needs reliable information, proposed connections need an acceptable outlet, and unresolved assumptions need follow-up. A line on a plan does not establish permission to connect or confirm spare municipal capacity.
When is a site servicing plan required?
The reviewing municipality determines the submission requirements for the application. Toronto lists a Site Servicing Plan among its Site Plan Control requirements. Other municipalities may use different terminology, forms or submission stages. Requirements should therefore be checked for the actual property and proposal.
Projects that create or change servicing commonly warrant an early discussion. Examples include redevelopment, new buildings, larger additions, subdivisions and changes to existing connections. However, the application type and extent of the work matter more than the project label alone.
Before detailed design begins, obtain any pre-application comments or submission checklist. Share the full comments with the project team, including requirements assigned to other disciplines. This helps establish whether servicing drawings, an FSR, stormwater analysis or additional studies are needed together.
Start your site servicing plan with reliable records
Servicing design depends on the relationship between the property, proposed building and existing infrastructure. For this reason, a current topographic survey provides an important starting point. The site plan then shows the development the services must support. These documents need compatible coordinates, elevations and drawing versions.
Useful background may include municipal record drawings, previous approved plans, utility information and known service connections. Nevertheless, records can contain gaps or reflect an earlier condition. The design should identify information that still needs verification rather than presenting an assumption as a measured fact.
Owners can help by providing all available records at the outset. An old drawing should keep its original date and context. It may explain the site’s history without being suitable as the sole basis for a new connection design.
What a site servicing plan may show
A clear plan separates existing conditions from proposed work. It also distinguishes services to remain, services to be disconnected and new connections. As a result, the reader should be able to follow each system from the building interface to the proposed outlet or supply point.
Typical drawing information includes property limits, building footprints, service routes, connection points, pipe sizes and elevations. Depending on the project, the package may include structures, valves, hydrants, details and supporting notes. The final content follows the applicable submission requirements.
Drawing clarity matters as much as the amount of information shown. Symbols need a useful legend, labels need to remain legible, and details should refer to the correct locations. Conflicting notes or overlapping lines can obscure an otherwise workable design.
Water servicing design: connect the layout with demand
Water servicing design considers how the proposed development will receive water and how the private system connects to the available supply. The drawing may identify the connection, service route, valves and relevant site features. Its supporting information must match the proposed use.
Domestic demand and fire-protection requirements involve different considerations. The project team should agree who is providing the relevant information and whether additional testing or analysis is required. A nearby watermain is useful background, but does not by itself confirm that a particular design will be acceptable.
Coordination with building-services designers is important at the building entry. For example, a late change to the service room or building footprint can affect the exterior route. Resolving that interface early makes the site servicing plan more useful to the full team.
Sanitary servicing design: connections and elevations
Sanitary servicing shows the intended route for wastewater from the development. Pipe alignment, connection elevation and the building discharge point need to work together. Where gravity drainage is proposed, the available vertical relationship is a central design consideration.
The plan may include pipe sizes, slopes, invert elevations and access structures. Supporting flow information should reflect the current development rather than an earlier unit count or land use. If records do not confirm the intended connection, the uncertainty should remain visible until it is resolved.
A private pipe layout and a downstream capacity review answer different questions. However, some projects need both. Elmid Design Inc. can clarify whether the agreed assignment includes only the site drawing or also the supporting servicing analysis requested by the authority.
Storm servicing design: pipes and surface drainage
Storm servicing addresses how collected runoff enters the proposed drainage system and reaches an acceptable outlet. The site drawing may show catch basins, maintenance holes, pipes and connections. Its arrangement must also be compatible with the grading and stormwater strategy.
Surface drainage remains important even where underground pipes are provided. The grading plan explains how runoff moves across the property, while the servicing plan identifies the infrastructure that receives or conveys it. These drawings should tell a consistent story at driveways, low points and building entrances.
Stormwater controls may introduce additional structures and space requirements. The servicing layout should reflect the current stormwater design, rather than reserving a vague location that cannot accommodate the final arrangement. Similarly, outlet assumptions need the same care as the collection system.
PEO Certificate of Authorization
Elmid Design Inc. holds a Certificate of Authorization from Professional Engineers Ontario (PEO).
A Certificate of Authorization permits a firm to offer professional engineering services to the public. It is distinct from an individual engineer’s licence and does not replace project-specific municipal review.
Read PEO’s Certificate of Authorization guidance or consult the official PEO directory.
Roof and foundation drainage in a site servicing plan
Roof runoff and foundation drainage should not be treated as interchangeable flows. Their proposed handling depends on the building design, local requirements and relevant supporting information. The civil and building-services teams need to coordinate the points where these systems meet the site design.
A servicing drawing should make the intended arrangement understandable without implying that every discharge can connect to any available sewer. Where a separate investigation, approval or design decision is outstanding, the submission should identify that dependency.
Owners should share information about basements, below-grade spaces and proposed mechanical arrangements early. For example, a change in building depth or drainage strategy can affect the servicing package. Early coordination helps prevent a finished drawing from relying on an outdated building assumption.
Coordinate the grading plan and site servicing plan
The servicing and grading drawings share the same site but communicate different information. Grading establishes proposed surface levels and drainage paths. Servicing identifies the buried infrastructure and connections. Each can influence the other, especially where the available vertical space is limited.
Catch basin locations should correspond with the grading arrangement. Similarly, service structures need suitable surface elevations and access. Building floor levels, driveways and accessible routes can constrain how the design fits together.
The team should check both plans whenever major elevations change. Updating one drawing in isolation may leave an unnoticed inconsistency elsewhere. Elmid Design Inc. can coordinate related civil drawings within the agreed scope, while other consultants remain responsible for their own design inputs.
Site servicing design around utilities, trees and access
Water, sewer and storm infrastructure must share the property with other features. Utility corridors, landscape areas, protected trees, entrances and structural elements can all influence the available service routes. A practical layout therefore needs more than a direct line between two points.
Coordination should consider the latest information from the relevant consultants and utility providers. Where records are incomplete, additional confirmation may be needed before the route is finalized. The plan should not suggest that a utility conflict has been resolved simply because a line has been moved on paper.
Maintenance access also deserves attention. Structures and equipment need an arrangement that can be reviewed for operation as well as initial installation. Bringing these issues into the design discussion early helps the owner understand the space implications.
Site servicing plans at boundaries and off-site connections
A proposed service route may approach a property line, cross a shared area or extend into a public right-of-way. These conditions affect more than the technical alignment. Ownership, access and the authority’s connection process may also need to be addressed.
The servicing plan should clearly identify the limits of the proposed work. However, it should not imply permission to use neighbouring land or to alter public infrastructure. Where an easement or separate approval is relevant, the project team needs to confirm the appropriate process.
For an owner comparing development options, off-site work can be a significant planning consideration. Identifying that possibility early is useful even before detailed design is complete. Any cost, legal or implementation decisions should then be reviewed by the appropriate project advisers.
Site servicing plan or Functional Servicing Report?
A site servicing plan presents the physical servicing arrangement. A Functional Servicing Report explains the proposed approach and supporting analysis. The report may discuss existing infrastructure, projected demands and further work needed to support the development. Many applications require both documents.
The two should use the same development description and compatible assumptions. A report based on an earlier building size can become inconsistent with a revised drawing. Likewise, a drawing may show a connection that the report has not assessed.
The useful question is not which document is better. It is which combination the authority requires and what evidence each document needs to provide. Elmid Design Inc. can help define that scope before preparing the coordinated submission.
How stormwater reporting supports the servicing plan
A stormwater management report addresses the runoff analysis and management approach required for the project. Its role extends beyond drawing the storm pipes. Depending on the applicable scope, it may establish the controls and supporting calculations that the servicing plan must reflect.
For this reason, the drawing and report should identify the same outlets and proposed measures. If the stormwater design changes, the corresponding structure, connection or layout may also need revision. This coordination is particularly important where the site has limited space.
The project brief should say whether stormwater reporting is included, provided by another consultant or still being scoped. Clear responsibility avoids a gap between a servicing drawing that assumes controls and a report that has not yet established them.
Site servicing plan design and review process
First, Elmid Design Inc. reviews the project information and identifies the intended submission. This establishes the development description, available records and important gaps. The agreed scope should explain which drawings, calculations and coordination tasks will be prepared.
Next, the team develops the servicing arrangement and checks its relationship with the site and building information. Significant uncertainties should be raised while there is still room to adjust the layout. The coordinated package can then be prepared for the applicable review process.
Municipal comments may lead to revisions or requests for additional information. The design team should review those comments against the original scope and current proposal. A clear response explains what changed and flags any issue that remains dependent on another party.
What to send for an initial scope review
Start with the property address and a short description of the proposed work. Include the drawings that show the latest development, even if they are preliminary. Explain whether the assignment supports a building permit, site plan application, subdivision or another review stage.
- Current topographic survey and proposed site plan
- Building plans, floor elevations and service-room locations
- Available municipal service records and previous approved drawings
- Existing utility information and known water, sanitary or storm connections
- Related grading, drainage and stormwater reports
- Complete municipal comments and the current submission checklist
Tell Elmid Design Inc. which documents are still being prepared and when they are expected. A clear proposal can then distinguish available information, required follow-up and work provided by other consultants. This is more useful than assuming every listed document is required on every property.
Site servicing plan revisions and document coordination
Development drawings often change during design and review. Building footprints, finished floors, access routes and landscape areas can all affect servicing. The owner or project lead should ensure that each consultant receives the current version of the information they rely on.
A revision should identify the changed design and its consequences for related documents. For example, moving a building entry may affect an exterior service route. Similarly, changing a parking arrangement may affect storm collection points and grading.
Keep municipal comments with the drawing package rather than forwarding isolated extracts. A comment that appears to concern one discipline may depend on another. Consistent issue dates and clear response notes make the submission easier to review without promising a particular approval outcome.
Not sure which service you need?
Elmid Design Inc. provides engineering consulting and design for building and land development projects. Share your property details and the municipality’s comments so we can identify the engineering support your project may need.
Related work may include a Functional Servicing Report, a site grading plan or stormwater management design. The agreed scope identifies which documents are needed and how they will be coordinated.
Review your site servicing plan before submission
Before submission, the owner and project team should review whether the drawing reflects the development they intend to pursue. The check is not a substitute for engineering review. It is a chance to identify changes in the proposed building, use or project boundaries that may not have reached every consultant.
Confirm that the drawing title, property information and background plan are current. Check that services intended to remain are clearly distinguished from proposed work. Where an important decision is unresolved, ask how it is recorded and what information is needed next.
The package should also identify its purpose. A preliminary coordination drawing should not be used as though it were a final construction issue. Understanding the issue status helps everyone use the information appropriately.
Fees and schedules for your site servicing plan
The cost of a site servicing plan depends on the assignment. A limited connection drawing differs from a coordinated redevelopment package with analysis, multiple structures and municipal review support. Available records, site constraints and the number of design changes also affect the work.
A useful proposal should explain the deliverables, assumptions and included review support. It should also distinguish the consultant’s work from survey, testing, municipal charges and other specialist services where applicable. This makes quotations easier to compare on scope rather than price alone.
The design schedule depends partly on when reliable inputs become available. However, municipal review and third-party responses follow their own processes. Discuss the required submission date early, while keeping the design programme separate from any hoped-for approval date.
Using site servicing plans during construction review
A servicing drawing prepared for an application is part of a wider project process. Submission or technical review does not automatically authorize every construction activity, connection or road occupation. The owner and contractor need to establish the relevant permissions before work begins.
If field conditions differ from the design information, the issue should be referred to the appropriate designer. Unreviewed changes can affect other parts of the servicing or grading arrangement. The required response depends on the nature of the discrepancy and the project’s approval conditions.
Elmid Design Inc. provides engineering consulting, drawings, reports and agreed review support. Excavation, pipe installation and construction are separate contractor activities. Construction-stage services, if needed, should be specifically included in the professional assignment.
Engineering responsibility and municipal guidance
Elmid Design Inc. holds a Certificate of Authorization from Professional Engineers Ontario. Professional responsibility, municipal acceptance and contractor execution are distinct parts of the project. The servicing assignment should clearly identify the engineering deliverables and any additional services required.
Toronto’s application terms of reference explain its Site Servicing Plan requirements and identify the relevant municipal design guidance. The City also distinguishes the scope of supporting studies during application review. Other municipalities have their own standards and submission processes.
Use the current requirements for the property rather than copying a package from another jurisdiction. The official references below provide a starting point for discussion. They do not replace project-specific engineering review or confirmation of the authority’s requirements.
Site servicing project examples
These examples from Elmid Design Inc.’s public project portfolio show the engineering and design services listed for each property.
Design drawings for two semi-detached dwellings, including structural, mechanical, grading and servicing plans.
Functional servicing and stormwater management reports, grading and servicing plans, sanitary and storm drainage plans, plan and profile drawings, and erosion and sediment control.
Functional servicing and stormwater management reports, grading and servicing plans, and erosion and sediment control.
Frequently Asked Questions
Can an existing water or sewer connection be reused?
Possibly, but the existing connection needs to be assessed against the proposed work. Its location, condition, size and available records may influence that decision. The new development may also have different demands or building elevations.
Send any previous servicing drawings and known connection information for review. Do not assume that a connection serving the current building will automatically suit a replacement building. Where further investigation is necessary, the scope should identify it before the design relies on reuse.
Do I need a survey before requesting a quote?
You can request an initial scope review before the survey is ready. A property address, project description and preliminary plans can help explain the assignment. However, detailed servicing design normally needs reliable site and elevation information.
Tell Elmid Design Inc. which documents are available and which are still being prepared. This allows the proposal to identify dependencies. An initial discussion can establish the next steps without treating an incomplete background package as sufficient for final drawings.
Can the servicing plan be combined with the grading plan?
A combined drawing may be appropriate where the municipality accepts it and the information remains clear. On a complex site, separate coordinated sheets may communicate the design more effectively. The required format depends on the assignment and submission requirements.
Combining the drawings does not eliminate either design task. Surface drainage, service elevations and infrastructure details still need to be coordinated. The project team should choose a presentation that keeps the relevant information legible at the intended drawing scale.
What if there is no municipal storm sewer beside the property?
The project needs an acceptable drainage approach based on the site conditions and reviewing authority's requirements. The absence of a nearby storm sewer does not establish which alternative will be suitable. It may change the studies and coordination required.
Provide any existing drainage information and previous municipal comments early. Elmid Design Inc. can review the engineering scope and identify the questions that need to be resolved. A proposed outlet should not be assumed available before the relevant constraints are assessed.
Does a servicing plan confirm municipal sewer capacity?
A layout drawing alone does not establish the capacity of the downstream system. The authority may require calculations, a servicing report or further assessment to support the proposed connection. The required extent depends on the project and local criteria.
When requesting a quote, share any comments about capacity or downstream analysis. This helps distinguish the drawing scope from supporting studies. It also avoids presenting a connection shown for coordination as though all external servicing questions have already been settled.
Will the plan include fire-flow analysis?
Fire-flow work is included only where it forms part of the agreed assignment and applicable project requirements. The civil team may need information from the building and fire-protection designers, together with relevant water-system information.
Ask for the proposal to identify who provides each input and what analysis is included. A servicing drawing can show a water connection without, by itself, demonstrating every aspect of the fire-protection design. Clear responsibilities help prevent an important assumption from falling between disciplines.
Can Elmid Design Inc. respond to municipal comments?
Elmid Design Inc. can provide review responses and drawing revisions within the agreed professional scope. The extent of that support should be stated in the proposal. Some comments may require new information or work by another consultant.
Send the complete comment letter and current project drawings. The team can then assess how the comments relate to the submitted design. A response should address the actual issue, identify the relevant change and distinguish unresolved dependencies from completed revisions.
How much will a site servicing plan cost?
Fees depend on the site's complexity, available information and required deliverables. New connections, multiple buildings, difficult elevations and coordination with supporting reports can affect the assignment. The number and nature of review stages also matter.
A project-specific proposal is more useful than a generic price. Provide the address, current plans and submission requirements so the work can be scoped. Confirm whether survey, testing, specialist reports and municipal charges are separate before comparing proposals from different providers.
How long does the design and approval process take?
Design timing depends on the scope and when reliable information becomes available. Municipal review follows a separate process, and additional comments can create further design work. No single timeline applies to every property or application.
Discuss the target submission date at the beginning. The team can identify the inputs and decisions needed to work toward it. Keep that design target distinct from an approval date, especially where records, external studies or authority responses remain outstanding.
Does Elmid Design Inc. install pipes or perform excavation?
Elmid Design Inc. provides professional engineering consulting, including servicing drawings, supporting reports and agreed review support. Installation and excavation are performed by the owner's contractor. The engineering assignment does not automatically include construction management or continuous site supervision.
If the project requires construction-stage review, record drawings or other follow-up services, discuss those needs when defining the scope. Separating responsibilities clearly helps the owner arrange the appropriate professionals and contractors for each stage of the project.
Official references and useful next steps
Check the City of Toronto’s application terms of reference for its site servicing and related report requirements. Confirm the applicable scope with the reviewing municipality for your property.
For a proposal that creates a new lot, see our lot severance servicing guide for new and retained lots. Resolve the servicing arrangement for both properties before detailed design.
Site Servicing Experience by Municipality
Elmid Design Inc.’s public project portfolio documents site servicing work in the six municipalities below. Expand a municipality for a project example and official local guidance. These examples describe engineering scope; they do not establish project approval or construction completion.
See Municipalities
Toronto
The published scope for 2970 Lake Shore Boulevard West includes grading and servicing plans, functional servicing and stormwater management reports, and erosion and sediment control. Toronto’s Site Servicing Plan terms of reference explain the required drawing information for Site Plan Control applications.
Toronto site servicing guidance
Related reading: Site servicing plans in Toronto.
Richmond Hill
The portfolio lists servicing plans for two semi-detached dwellings at 22 Elm Grove Avenue. It also lists subdivision servicing and plan and profile drawings for Clinton Drive Extension. Richmond Hill’s subdivision guidance distinguishes draft approval from the subsequent engineering submission process.
Richmond Hill subdivision engineering guidance
Related reading: Site servicing plans in Richmond Hill.
Aurora
At 169 Edward Street, the published scope includes grading and servicing plans, sanitary and storm drainage plans, and plan and profile drawings. Aurora’s Development Engineering team reviews servicing requirements and detailed engineering designs for applicable site plan and subdivision applications.
Aurora development engineering guidance
Related reading: Site servicing plans in Aurora.
Burlington
The portfolio lists grading and servicing plans and plan and profile drawings for 4440 South Service Road. Burlington’s Site Plan Application Guidelines include servicing and grading information such as connection locations, pipe sizes, elevations and drainage coordination. Confirm the current submission requirements for the site.
Burlington site plan servicing guidance
Related reading: Site servicing plans in Burlington.
Brampton
At 10394 Hurontario Street, the published scope includes grading and servicing plans, sanitary and storm drainage plans, and plan and profile drawings. Brampton’s development application process lists site servicing among the typical site plan submission materials, depending on the scale and scope of the project.
Brampton site plan submission guidance
Related reading: Site servicing plans in Brampton.
Oshawa
The published scope for Phillip Murray Avenue includes grading and servicing plans, functional servicing and stormwater management reports, and erosion and sediment control. Oshawa’s developer requirements describe servicing drawings and related submission information for different development types. Confirm the requirements for the proposed project.
Oshawa developer servicing guidance
Related reading: Site servicing plans in Oshawa.
Geographic Locations That We Service:
Elmid Design Inc. provides professional site servicing design for water, sanitary and storm connections across the Ontario service areas below. Our engineers coordinate the site servicing plan with grading, stormwater management and the project’s submission requirements.
These are service areas, not additional office locations. The engineering scope and applicable standards depend on the property and reviewing authority.
Toronto and Surrounding Areas
We provide engineering services in Toronto and provide grading engineering resources through our Toronto grading plan page.
Our service area also includes Oshawa, Pickering with our Pickering grading plan resources, and Clarington.
We also provide engineering services in Ajax through our Ajax grading plan resources, Whitby, Brock, Scugog, and Uxbridge, including our Uxbridge grading plan resources.
Halton Region
Within Halton Region, we provide engineering services in Burlington, including projects requiring Burlington grading plans.
We also provide engineering services in Halton Hills, supported by our Halton Hills grading plan resources.
Our service area also includes Milton and Oakville, including our Oakville grading plan resources.
Peel Region
Within Peel Region, we provide engineering services in Brampton, including projects requiring Brampton grading plans.
We also provide engineering services in Mississauga through our Mississauga grading plan resources and Caledon through our Caledon grading plan resources.
York Region
Within York Region, we provide engineering services in Vaughan and provide information about Vaughan grading plans.
We also provide engineering services in Aurora through our Aurora grading plan resources and East Gwillimbury through our East Gwillimbury grading plan resources.
Additional service areas include Georgina with our Georgina grading plan resources, Markham with our Markham grading plan resources, and Newmarket with our Newmarket grading plan resources.
We also provide engineering services in Richmond Hill with our Richmond Hill grading plan resources, Whitchurch-Stouffville through our Whitchurch-Stouffville grading plan resources, and King through our King grading plan resources.
Our service area also includes Bradford West Gwillimbury.
Other Southern Ontario Cities and Towns
We provide engineering services in many additional Southern Ontario communities, including Hamilton, St. Catharines, Niagara-on-the-Lake, Brant, Cambridge, Kitchener, Waterloo, and Woodstock.
We also provide engineering services in Guelph, Centre Wellington, Shelburne, Orangeville, New Tecumseth, Essa, Collingwood, Wasaga Beach, and Barrie, including our Barrie grading plan resources.
Additional service areas include Midland, Orillia with our Orillia grading plan resources, Ramara, Minden Hills, North Kawartha, Kawartha Lakes, Peterborough, Selwyn, and Brighton.